$ADP · Automatic Data Processing

Tech / HCM SoftwareNDX100
EPS 0–0
DIR 0–0
MAE

Latest call · 2026-04-28

⏳ Awaiting result · earnings 2026-04-29 BMO

The call

EPS
$3.36
BEAT· +1.8% vs street
Direction
🟢 UP
1d +1.0% · 3d +1.8%
Confidence
MEDIUM
Positioning: hype_neutral
Spot at call
$197.23
as of 2026-04-28

Head-to-head · Claude vs the Street vs reality

Claude Street Actual
EPS $3.36 $3.30 ⏳ pending
Revenue $5.93B $5.90B
Direction (1d) 🟢 UP 🟡 FLAT
9B · 14H · 2S
1d move +1.0%
3d move +1.8%

Thesis

ADP goes into print at a 5-day low while NFP-watchers are extrapolating labor weakness into pays-per-control. Float income is running above Street's modeled levels because rates stayed higher-for-longer, and the compliance attach-rate continues to step up. PAYX (3/26) already validated the pricing-led growth thesis for the HCM group.

What would flip it

Pays-per-control turning negative (rather than flat) on a real labor-market crack would flip this to a -1 to -2%.

💡 Defensive beat-and-reaffirm. Long, modest +1% pop the base case.

The market's narrative

ADP -2.5% over 5d on weakening NFP/JOLTS data the market is extrapolating into pays-per-control flat-to-down. Street modeling employer services +5.7%, PEO +5.8%, in line with co. guide.

Where the Street may be wrong

  • Float income (a high-margin component) running above modeled levels with rates higher-for-longer — Street still using forward-curve assumptions from Feb-26.
  • Compliance product attach-rate continues stepping up as small businesses navigate FY26 1099/W2 rules — recurring revenue uplift not in consensus.
  • Pays-per-control flat = revenue growth driven entirely by per-employee-pricing + product mix, which is the high-margin lever.

Peer read: PAYX (3/26 print) raised FY guide on similar pays-per-control flat + pricing-led mix; PCTY pre-released constructive April commentary.

Reasoning

  • Beat-prone: 4-quarter beat streak, average surprise +2.2%.
  • Float income running above modeled levels (rates higher-for-longer).
  • PAYX read-through (3/26) confirmed the pricing-led growth thesis playing out.
  • Pre-print -2.5% pullback de-risked entry on macro labor concerns that don't show up in HCM data.
  • Defensive recurring-revenue mix means even a 'beat-and-reaffirm' delivers +0.5-1.5% in the current macro tape.

Risks to the call

  • Pays-per-control turning negative (vs flat) on labor-market deterioration — the bear case if NFP misses on 5/2.
  • AXP-style beat-and-reaffirm with stock close to PT would cap upside at flat-ish.